Cosima Pelludat

29 papers receiving 799 citations

Peers

Cosima Pelludat
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Endocrinology 114
  • Molecular Medicine 57
  • Plant Science 302
  • Ecology 187
  • Genetics 188
Replace Ludovic Vial with:
Ludovic Vial France
Rita E. Monson United Kingdom
H. K. Mahanty New Zealand
Philip A. Bronstein United States
Maarten G. K. Ghequire Belgium
Scott A. C. Godfrey New Zealand
Granger Sutton United States
Heidi Hyytiäinen Finland
Annabelle Mérieau France
Quan Zeng United States
Cosima Pelludat relative to Ludovic Vial France Ludovic Vial's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ludovic Vial · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cosima Pelludat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cosima Pelludat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cosima Pelludat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cosima Pelludat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cosima Pelludat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cosima Pelludat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cosima Pelludat. The network helps show where Cosima Pelludat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cosima Pelludat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cosima Pelludat Line = papers co-authored together Cosima Pelludat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015154
2 1998152
3 200348
4 201148
5 200346
6 200145
7 201633
8 201831
9 201730
10 201029
11 200129
12 200222
13 202021
14 202220
15 200519
16 200915
17 201010
18 20229
19 20109
20 20218

About Cosima Pelludat

Cosima Pelludat is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cell Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (15 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (11 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (6 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (5 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (4 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (114 citations), Molecular Medicine (57 citations), Plant Science (302 citations), Ecology (187 citations) and Genetics (188 citations). Cosima Pelludat has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Mitja N. P. Remus‐Emsermann, Florian M. Freimoser, Christoph A. Jacobi, Alexander Rakin, J. Heesemann, Brion Duffy, S. Schubert, Jürgen Heesemann, Wolf‐Dietrich Hardt and Joël F. Pothier. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Microbiology, Journal of Bacteriology, Frontiers in Microbiology and Phytobiomes Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact