Countries where authors publish in Phytobiomes Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phytobiomes Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phytobiomes Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phytobiomes Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Phytobiomes Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phytobiomes Journal.
About Phytobiomes Journal
The 316 papers published in Phytobiomes Journal in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Phytobiomes Journal usually cover Plant Science (268 papers), Cell Biology (113 papers), Horticulture (6 papers), Endocrinology (16 papers) and Insect Science (24 papers) specifically the topics of Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (114 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (113 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (84 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (58 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (52 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (31 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (28 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phytobiomes Journal are Ann M. Hirsch, Pilar Martínez‐Hidalgo, Kristi Gdanetz, Frances Trail, Gabriele Berg, Christine V. Hawkes, Blaire Steven, Tomislav Cernava, Yong‐Hwan Lee and Hyun Kim.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.