Constentin Dieme

663 citations
22 papers · 436 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Constentin Dieme

22 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Constentin Dieme
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Parasitology 167
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 220
  • Infectious Diseases 143
  • Clinical Biochemistry 53
  • Insect Science 94
Replace Amira Nebbak with:
Amira Nebbak Algeria
Εmmanouil Dokianakis Greece
Seynabou Sougoufara France
Nathalie Boulanger France
Laurel Respicio-Kingry United States
Romuald Carinci French Guiana
Silvia Ciocchetta Italy
Anna M. Schotthoefer United States
Chelsea Nguyen Australia
Michael Reiter Austria
Constentin Dieme relative to Amira Nebbak Algeria Amira Nebbak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Amira Nebbak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constentin Dieme

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constentin Dieme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constentin Dieme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constentin Dieme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constentin Dieme

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constentin Dieme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constentin Dieme. The network helps show where Constentin Dieme may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constentin Dieme, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constentin Dieme Line = papers co-authored together Constentin Dieme links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015115
2 201474
3 201649
4 201544
5 202023
6 202112
7 202012
8 202011
9 201510
10 202210
11 201710
12 202110
13 202210
14 20249
15 20208
16 20228
17 20226
18 20224
19 20223
20 20243

About Constentin Dieme

Constentin Dieme is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science, Infectious Diseases, Parasitology and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (11 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (4 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (3 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (3 papers), Malaria Research and Control (2 papers), Bartonella species infections research (2 papers) and Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (167 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (220 citations), Infectious Diseases (143 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (53 citations) and Insect Science (94 citations). Constentin Dieme has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Senegal. Frequent co-authors include Didier Raoult, Philippe Parola, Jean-Michel Bérenger, Cristina Socolovschi, Lionel Alméras, Laura D. Kramer, Ousmane Faye, Yassina Bechah, Alexander T. Ciota and Gilles Audoly. Their work appears in journals such as Parasites & Vectors, Malaria Journal, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, mBio and Emerging Microbes & Infections.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact