Constance Percy

1.0k citations
14 papers · 881 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Oncology top 5%
    • Viral-associated cancers and disorders
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
    • Cancer Risks and Factors
    • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Papers in

Constance Percy

14 papers receiving 807 citations

Peers

Constance Percy
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Oncology 410
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 202
  • Genetics 91
  • Virology 24
  • Neurology 63
Replace Claudia Little with:
Claudia Little United States
Savina Aversa Italy
L. de Lumley France
J. van der Lelie Netherlands
WE Fibbe Netherlands
Tai-Shing Lau Hong Kong
Penelope R. A. Taylor United Kingdom
Sheema H Hasan Pakistan
GM Schmidt United States
Hans Grünwald United States
Constance Percy relative to Claudia Little United States Claudia Little's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Claudia Little · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance Percy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Percy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Percy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Percy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Percy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Percy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Percy. The network helps show where Constance Percy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Constance Percy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance Percy Line = papers co-authored together Constance Percy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: incidence and mortality data, 1973-77.
1981368
2 1997230
3 198986
4 198450
5 199149
6 199531
7 199018
8 196818
9 196813
10 20037
11 19676
12 19973
13 19691
14 19851

About Constance Percy

Constance Percy is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Neurology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 881 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Lung Cancer Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (410 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (202 citations), Genetics (91 citations), Virology (24 citations) and Neurology (63 citations). Constance Percy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Romania. Frequent co-authors include John L. Young, Ardyce J. Asire, C. S. Muir, Robert J. Biggar, William A. Blattner, Philip S. Rosenberg, Susan S. Devesa, Frances J. Yellin, Timothy R. Coté and George Lemp. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, International Journal of Cancer, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact