Connie Van

1.0k citations
47 papers · 634 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Connie Van

43 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

Connie Van
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 106
  • Toxicology 43
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 50
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 9
  • Emergency Medicine 59
Replace Rebekah Schiff with:
Rebekah Schiff United Kingdom
Aseel S. Abuzour United Kingdom
Neelam Dhingra‐Kumar Switzerland
Kevin M. Terrell United States
Heather Sherman United States
Rhonda Wyskiel United States
Johanna Ulfvarson Sweden
Jeffrey J. Glasheen United States
Ella E. Lyons United States
Maria Unbeck Sweden
Connie Van relative to Rebekah Schiff United Kingdom Rebekah Schiff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rebekah Schiff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Connie Van

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Connie Van's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Connie Van with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connie Van more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Connie Van

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Connie Van. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Connie Van. The network helps show where Connie Van may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Connie Van, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Connie Van Line = papers co-authored together Connie Van links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201665
2 201554
3 201149
4 201245
5 201932
6 202128
7 201327
8 201927
9 201723
10 201522
11 201922
12 201620
13 201920
14 200720
15 201217
16 201216
17 202116
18 202214
19 202214
20 202011

About Connie Van

Connie Van is a scholar working on Nephrology, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Toxicology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (5 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (5 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers) and Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (106 citations), Toxicology (43 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (50 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (9 citations) and Emergency Medicine (59 citations). Connie Van has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kate Curtis, Ines Krass, Kim Foster, Rebecca Mitchell, Bernadette Mitchell, Daniel Costa, Ronald L. Castelino, Syed Tabish R. Zaidi, Andrea McCloughen and Kamal Sud. Their work appears in journals such as Injury, Journal of Nephrology, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact