Connie Stephens
Impact in
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Mace L. Rothenberg (4 shared papers)Daniel D. Von Hoff (3 shared papers)Manuel Modiano (2 shared papers)Malcolm J. Moore (2 shared papers)Anna Maria Storniolo (2 shared papers)Peter G. Tarassoff (2 shared papers)Ryan Nelson (2 shared papers)F. Andrew Dorr (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (3 papers)Investigational New Drugs (1 paper)Cancer Biology & Therapy (1 paper)Hematological Oncology (1 paper)Annals of Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaSpain
In The Last Decade
Connie Stephens
9 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Connie Stephens's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Oncology 3.9k
- Cancer Research 1.4k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.1k
- Epidemiology 1.1k
- Hepatology 208
Countries citing papers authored by Connie Stephens
This map shows the geographic impact of Connie Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Connie Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connie Stephens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Connie Stephens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Connie Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Connie Stephens. The network helps show where Connie Stephens may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Connie Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. Hit paper breakdown → | 1997 | 4630 |
| 2 | 2005 | 129 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 3 |
About Connie Stephens
Connie Stephens is a scholar working on Oncology, Genetics, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (3.9k citations), Cancer Research (1.4k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.1k citations), Epidemiology (1.1k citations) and Hepatology (208 citations). Connie Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Mace L. Rothenberg, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Manuel Modiano, Malcolm J. Moore, Anna Maria Storniolo, Peter G. Tarassoff, Ryan Nelson, F. Andrew Dorr, John Sahl Andersen and Howard A. Burris. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Investigational New Drugs, Cancer Biology & Therapy, Hematological Oncology and Annals of Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.