Cong Li

63 papers receiving 696 citations

Peers

Cong Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Otorhinolaryngology 36
  • Statistics and Probability 34
  • Radiation 30
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 68
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 41
Replace Austin R. Pantel with:
Austin R. Pantel United States
K Hendrickson United States
Jan Poleszczuk Poland
W. P. Smith United States
Shu‐Ju Tu Taiwan
D. Guirado Spain
Shigeru Yamada Japan
Anna G. Sorace United States
Dahl Park South Korea
Rita Casadonte Germany
Cong Li relative to Austin R. Pantel United States Austin R. Pantel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Austin R. Pantel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Li. The network helps show where Cong Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Li Line = papers co-authored together Cong Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202193
2 201856
3 202249
4 202341
5 201637
6 201435
7 201033
8 202329
9 201925
10 201823
11 201519
12 202217
13 202116
14 201516
15 202116
16 202013
17 202112
18 202311
19 202311
20 202111

About Cong Li

Cong Li is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Radiation, having authored 75 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (9 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (8 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (4 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (3 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (3 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (36 citations), Statistics and Probability (34 citations), Radiation (30 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (68 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (41 citations). Cong Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Dehui Wang, Haixiang Zhang, Wen Wan, Xiaoying Cao, Lianzhen Zhong, Lai‐Sheng Meng, Jie Tian, Di Dong, Liwen Zhang and Zhenhua Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Physical review. B., Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Science Bulletin and Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact