Colette Foa

26 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers

Colette Foa
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Immunology and Allergy 141
  • Cell Biology 209
  • Immunology 183
  • Structural Biology 9
  • Molecular Biology 419
Replace David C. Briggs with:
David C. Briggs United Kingdom
TP Stossel United States
Michael D. Flanagan United States
Jochen Seebach Germany
L. Miya Fujimoto United States
Edith Elliott South Africa
Evan Krystofiak United States
Sofia Khaitlina Russia
Wolfgang Bohn Germany
Francis Markey Sweden
Colette Foa relative to David C. Briggs United Kingdom David C. Briggs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David C. Briggs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colette Foa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colette Foa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colette Foa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colette Foa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colette Foa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colette Foa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colette Foa. The network helps show where Colette Foa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Colette Foa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colette Foa Line = papers co-authored together Colette Foa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994254
2 1997115
3 200071
4 199466
5 199453
6 199042
7 199240
8 199831
9 199728
10 197822
11 199420
12 198519
13 198818
14
Ultrastructural comparison between cultured and tumor cells of human malignant melanoma.
197718
15
Ultrastruct and biochemical chantes in cultured human malignant melanoma cells after heterotransplantation into nude mice.
197615
16 199614
17 197713
18 198413
19 197711
20 197710

About Colette Foa

Colette Foa is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Immunology and Allergy, Immunology and Oncology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 898 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (6 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (4 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (3 papers) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (141 citations), Cell Biology (209 citations), Immunology (183 citations), Structural Biology (9 citations) and Molecular Biology (419 citations). Colette Foa has collaborated with scholars based in France, Sweden and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Bongrand, Pierre Golstein, Anne‐Marie Benoliel, Julian D. Gross, Sophie Cornillon, Jean Davoust, Christian Capo, Gaëlle Bouvier, Anne Pierrès and Siham Sabri. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cell Science, Experimental Cell Research, Journal of Leukocyte Biology, Journal of Immunological Methods and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact