C.M. Flannery

680 citations
31 papers · 538 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

C.M. Flannery

31 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

C.M. Flannery
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Mechanics of Materials 186
  • Biomedical Engineering 319
  • Materials Chemistry 284
  • Ceramics and Composites 31
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 99
Replace J. Détaint with:
J. Détaint France
E.A. Stach United States
C. N. Afonso Spain
E. Chilla Germany
Tomonobu Hata Japan
Takao Inokuma Japan
Haikuan Kong China
H. Geisler Germany
Gilles Pernot France
Lawrence H. Friedman United States
C.M. Flannery relative to J. Détaint France J. Détaint's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
J. Détaint · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.M. Flannery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.M. Flannery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.M. Flannery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.M. Flannery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.M. Flannery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.M. Flannery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.M. Flannery. The network helps show where C.M. Flannery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.M. Flannery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.M. Flannery Line = papers co-authored together C.M. Flannery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000180
2 200257
3 200253
4 200536
5 200135
6 200227
7 200126
8 200320
9 199818
10 20009
11 20108
12 19998
13 20067
14 20007
15 20086
16 20125
17 19995
18 20024
19 20034
20 20063

About C.M. Flannery

C.M. Flannery is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 31 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (12 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (11 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (5 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (5 papers) and Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanics of Materials (186 citations), Biomedical Engineering (319 citations), Materials Chemistry (284 citations), Ceramics and Composites (31 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (99 citations). C.M. Flannery has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include E. Chilla, H.‐J. Fröhlich, U. Straube, Robert B. Heimann, T. Hauke, J. Böhm, M. Hengst, Mikhaı̈l R. Baklanov, Stefan E. Schulz and Christopher P. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Ultrasonics, Nanotechnology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact