Clive Stanton
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Papers in
-
- Tryptophan and brain disorders 3
-
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 3
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Matthew Large (2 shared papers)D. Chung (2 shared papers)Dušan Pavlović (1 shared paper)Christopher Ryan (1 shared paper)Swaran Preet Singh (1 shared paper)Oliver T. Dale (3 shared papers)Faisil Nasim Sethi (3 shared papers)Isabella Jacomb (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- JAMA Psychiatry (1 paper)Frontiers in Immunology (1 paper)Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (1 paper)Brain Behavior and Immunity (1 paper)Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Clive Stanton
9 papers receiving 666 citations
Clive Stanton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Biological Psychiatry 84
- Clinical Psychology 440
- Psychiatry and Mental health 129
- Behavioral Neuroscience 25
- Social Psychology 135
Countries citing papers authored by Clive Stanton
This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Stanton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Stanton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Stanton. The network helps show where Clive Stanton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clive Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suicide Rates After Discharge From Psychiatric Facilities Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 472 |
| 2 | 2018 | 88 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 |
About Clive Stanton
Clive Stanton is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (1 paper), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (1 paper) and Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (84 citations), Clinical Psychology (440 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (129 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations) and Social Psychology (135 citations). Clive Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Large, D. Chung, Dušan Pavlović, Christopher Ryan, Swaran Preet Singh, Oliver T. Dale, Faisil Nasim Sethi, Isabella Jacomb, Thomas Wesley Weickert and Dennis Liu. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Psychiatry, Frontiers in Immunology, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Brain Behavior and Immunity and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.