Clive Stanton
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Papers in
-
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 3
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
-
- Tryptophan and brain disorders 4
- Co-authors
- Matthew Large (2 shared papers)D. Chung (2 shared papers)Dušan Pavlović (1 shared paper)Christopher Ryan (1 shared paper)Swaran P. Singh (1 shared paper)Oliver Dale (3 shared papers)Faisil Sethi (3 shared papers)Rhoshel Lenroot (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (1 paper)Brain Behavior and Immunity (1 paper)Schizophrenia Bulletin (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Clive Stanton
10 papers receiving 635 citations
Clive Stanton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Biological Psychiatry 89
- Clinical Psychology 415
- Psychiatry and Mental health 125
- Behavioral Neuroscience 27
- Social Psychology 125
Countries citing papers authored by Clive Stanton
This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Stanton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Stanton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Stanton. The network helps show where Clive Stanton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clive Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suicide Rates After Discharge From Psychiatric Facilities Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 442 |
| 2 | 2018 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 |
About Clive Stanton
Clive Stanton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health, Behavioral Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 11 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (89 citations), Clinical Psychology (415 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (125 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (27 citations) and Social Psychology (125 citations). Clive Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Large, D. Chung, Dušan Pavlović, Christopher Ryan, Swaran P. Singh, Oliver Dale, Faisil Sethi, Rhoshel Lenroot, Isabella Jacomb and Cherrie Galletly. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Brain Behavior and Immunity and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.