Cliff A. Hooker

25 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Cliff A. Hooker
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • History and Philosophy of Science 73
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
  • Management Science and Operations Research 64
  • Information Systems and Management 27
  • Architecture 5
Replace W. Bernard Carlson with:
W. Bernard Carlson United States
Diane P. Michelfelder United States
Moritz Krell Germany
Atocha Aliseda Mexico
Sjoerd D. Zwart Netherlands
Marguerite Roy Canada
Marc De Mey Belgium
Morten Misfeldt Denmark
Roald Pieter Verhoeff Netherlands
Asle H. Kiran Netherlands
Cliff A. Hooker relative to W. Bernard Carlson United States W. Bernard Carlson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.4×
W. Bernard Carlson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cliff A. Hooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cliff A. Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cliff A. Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cliff A. Hooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cliff A. Hooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cliff A. Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cliff A. Hooker. The network helps show where Cliff A. Hooker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Cliff A. Hooker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cliff A. Hooker Line = papers co-authored together Cliff A. Hooker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013114
2 201248
3 201128
4 201228
5 201127
6 200924
7 200422
8 201115
9 201515
10 201014
11 201314
12 201412
13 201310
14 20187
15 20117
16 19795
17 20175
18 20184
19 20164
20 19844

About Cliff A. Hooker

Cliff A. Hooker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (9 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Design Education and Practice (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers), Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems (2 papers) and Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (71 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (64 citations), Information Systems and Management (27 citations) and Architecture (5 citations). Cliff A. Hooker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Robert Farrell, Barry Hoffmaster, Wayne D. Christensen, Giles Hooker, Thomas S. Brinsmead, Ian Kerridge, Ian E. Alexander and Claire T. Deakin. Their work appears in journals such as Design Studies, The American Journal of Bioethics, Molecular Therapy, Perspectives on Science and Minerva.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact