Clément Debacker

896 citations
21 papers · 295 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Clément Debacker

18 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Clément Debacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 153
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 91
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 48
  • Neurology 21
Replace Marina K. M. Alvim with:
Marina K. M. Alvim Brazil
Gangqiang Hou China
Elaine Williams United Kingdom
Mihaela Bustuchina ̆ Vlaicu France
David N. Thibodeaux United States
Alan Miranda Belgium
Paola Ballesteros‐Zebadúa Mexico
Brendan Santyr Canada
Lydiane Hirschler Netherlands
Ravnoor Gill Canada
Clément Debacker relative to Marina K. M. Alvim Brazil Marina K. M. Alvim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Marina K. M. Alvim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clément Debacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clément Debacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clément Debacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clément Debacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clément Debacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clément Debacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clément Debacker. The network helps show where Clément Debacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clément Debacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clément Debacker Line = papers co-authored together Clément Debacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202051
2 201744
3 201744
4 201429
5 201324
6 201420
7 202216
8 202015
9 202013
10 202010
11 20227
12 20167
13 20215
14 20214
15 20233
16 20231
17 20251
18 20241
19 20250
20 20250

About Clément Debacker

Clément Debacker is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (153 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (48 citations) and Neurology (21 citations). Clément Debacker has collaborated with scholars based in France, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Barbier, Tomokazu Tsurugizawa, Sascha Köhler, Jan Warnking, Lydiane Hirschler, Toru Takumi, Andrew Zalesky, Kota Tamada, Nicolas Pannetier and Sachise Karakawa. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, NeuroImage, PLoS ONE, Brain Communications and Journal of Neuroradiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact