Clément Debacker

1.0k citations
24 papers · 333 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Clément Debacker

22 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Clément Debacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 147
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 91
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 45
  • Neurology 17
Replace Elaine J. Williams with:
Elaine J. Williams United Kingdom
Ravnoor Singh Gill Canada
Brandon L. Brown United States
Mihaela Bustuchina ̆ Vlaicu France
Deng Mao United States
A. Elizabeth de Guzman Italy
David N. Thibodeaux United States
Sophia Stöcklein Germany
Henning M. Reimann Germany
Ping Tian China
Clément Debacker relative to Elaine J. Williams United Kingdom Elaine J. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Elaine J. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clément Debacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clément Debacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clément Debacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clément Debacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clément Debacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clément Debacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clément Debacker. The network helps show where Clément Debacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clément Debacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clément Debacker Line = papers co-authored together Clément Debacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202055
2 201745
3 201744
4 201432
5 201325
6 201424
7 202220
8 202016
9 202213
10 202013
11 202012
12 20167
13 20215
14 20215
15 20235
16 20243
17 20253
18 20252
19 20251
20 20251

About Clément Debacker

Clément Debacker is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, having authored 24 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (147 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (45 citations) and Neurology (17 citations). Clément Debacker has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Barbier, Tomokazu Tsurugizawa, Jan M. Warnking, Sascha Köhler, Lydiane Hirschler, Toru Takumi, Kota Tamada, Andrew Zalesky, Nicolas Adrien Pannetier and Sachise Karakawa. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, NeuroImage Clinical and Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact