Clematide

1.7k citations
106 papers · 942 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Clematide

97 papers receiving 833 citations

Peers

Clematide
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Artificial Intelligence 672
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 128
  • Molecular Biology 321
  • Information Systems 80
Replace Marc Verhagen with:
Marc Verhagen United States
György Szarvas Hungary
Waleed Ammar United States
Anni R. Coden United States
Mohammad Taher Pilehvar United Kingdom
Su Nam Kim Australia
Chunyu Kit Hong Kong
Richárd Farkas Hungary
Johannes Leveling Ireland
Diego Mollá Australia
Clematide relative to Marc Verhagen United States Marc Verhagen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Marc Verhagen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clematide

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clematide's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clematide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clematide more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clematide

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clematide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clematide. The network helps show where Clematide may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clematide, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clematide Line = papers co-authored together Clematide links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Querying the Semantic Web with Ginseng: A Guided Input Natural Language Search Engine
200959
2 201051
3 200838
4 201538
5 201736
6 202035
7 201830
8 200127
9 202024
10 201223
11 201823
12 201823
13 201422
14 201621
15 201221
16 201219
17 201819
18 201316
19 201115
20 201315

About Clematide

Clematide is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Molecular Biology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and General Social Sciences, having authored 106 papers that have together received 942 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (56 papers), Topic Modeling (44 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (29 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (25 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (7 papers), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (7 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (672 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (128 citations), Molecular Biology (321 citations) and Information Systems (80 citations). Clematide has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Makarov, Fabio Rinaldi, Martin Volk, Maud Ehrmann, Manfred Klenner, Gerold Schneider, Martin Romacker, Matteo Romanello, Kaarel Kaljurand and Christoph Kiefer. Their work appears in journals such as Database, Language Resources and Evaluation, BMC Bioinformatics, Journal of Biomedical Semantics and European Sociological Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact