Clea C. Evans

18 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Clea C. Evans
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Rehabilitation 53
  • Epidemiology 242
  • Clinical Psychology 126
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 34
  • Emergency Medicine 42
Replace Judith Gargaro with:
Judith Gargaro Canada
Jody Newman United States
Susan R. Borgaro United States
Melissa Felteau Canada
Carmela Pestell Australia
Cheryl Soo Australia
Brigid Waldron‐Perrine United States
Shree Bhalerao Canada
Rodger Wood United Kingdom
Lenore Hawley United States
Clea C. Evans relative to Judith Gargaro Canada Judith Gargaro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Judith Gargaro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clea C. Evans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clea C. Evans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clea C. Evans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clea C. Evans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clea C. Evans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clea C. Evans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clea C. Evans. The network helps show where Clea C. Evans may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Clea C. Evans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clea C. Evans Line = papers co-authored together Clea C. Evans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 199479
2 201374
3 200966
4 200762
5 200555
6 201232
7 200830
8 201228
9 201528
10 200826
11 200922
12 200819
13 200911
14 200810
15 19948
16 20093
17 20143
18 20091
19 20230

About Clea C. Evans

Clea C. Evans is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (10 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (53 citations), Epidemiology (242 citations), Clinical Psychology (126 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (34 citations) and Emergency Medicine (42 citations). Clea C. Evans has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark Sherer, Risa Nakase‐Richardson, Stuart A. Yablon, Arash Sepehri, Persephanie Silverthorn, Paul J. Frick, Chad D. Vickery, Jae Eun Lee, Scott D. Barnett and Todd G. Nick. Their work appears in journals such as Rehabilitation Psychology, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Psychological Assessment and PM&R.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact