Tasha Mott
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Family Practice top 10%
Papers in
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 4
- Genetics 3
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 3
- Co-authors
- Joanne Azulay (5 shared papers)Keith D. Cicerone (4 shared papers)John C. Friel (3 shared papers)Peter J. Weiden (2 shared papers)Bruce D. Rapkin (2 shared papers)Annette Zygmunt (2 shared papers)David Goldman (2 shared papers)A Francés (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (3 papers)Journal of Animal Science (2 papers)Schizophrenia Research (1 paper)Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (1 paper)Schizophrenia Bulletin (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Tasha Mott
10 papers receiving 695 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Psychiatry and Mental health 264
- Family Practice 23
- Emergency Medicine 92
- Epidemiology 340
- Clinical Psychology 126
Countries citing papers authored by Tasha Mott
This map shows the geographic impact of Tasha Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tasha Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tasha Mott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tasha Mott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tasha Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tasha Mott. The network helps show where Tasha Mott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Tasha Mott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 234 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 181 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 168 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 100 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 |
About Tasha Mott
Tasha Mott is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Genetics, Clinical Psychology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 738 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (264 citations), Family Practice (23 citations), Emergency Medicine (92 citations), Epidemiology (340 citations) and Clinical Psychology (126 citations). Tasha Mott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Azulay, Keith D. Cicerone, John C. Friel, Peter J. Weiden, Bruce D. Rapkin, Annette Zygmunt, David Goldman, A Francés, Colette M. Smart and M. D. MacNeil. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Animal Science, Schizophrenia Research, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.