Clay Mash

840 citations
36 papers · 638 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Clay Mash

35 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Clay Mash
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 309
  • Pharmacy 51
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 196
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 109
  • Social Psychology 158
Replace Evelin Bertin with:
Evelin Bertin United States
Eve E. Perris United States
Claudia Freitag Germany
Barbara D’Entremont Canada
Kelly L. Madole United States
Justine E. Hoch United States
Ichiro Uchiyama Japan
Bianca Jovanovic Germany
Klaus Libertus United States
Eugene Abravanel United States
Clay Mash relative to Evelin Bertin United States Evelin Bertin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Evelin Bertin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clay Mash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clay Mash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clay Mash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clay Mash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clay Mash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clay Mash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clay Mash. The network helps show where Clay Mash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clay Mash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clay Mash Line = papers co-authored together Clay Mash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201066
2 199946
3 199842
4 201335
5 201032
6 200330
7 200630
8 201129
9
Interobserver reliability of the Teller Acuity Card procedure in pediatric patients.
199628
10 200628
11 199526
12 200725
13 200422
14 200221
15 199921
16 201420
17 199816
18 201116
19 200912
20 200712

About Clay Mash

Clay Mash is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Automotive Engineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (309 citations), Pharmacy (51 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (196 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (109 citations) and Social Psychology (158 citations). Clay Mash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Marc H. Bornstein, Martha E. Arterberry, Velma Dobson, Nanmathi Manian, Bradford H. Pillow, Neil E. Berthier, Rachel E. Keen, Paul C. Quinn, Nancy A. Carpenter and Christopher Mark Norris. Their work appears in journals such as Infancy, Infant Behavior and Development, Developmental Science, Developmental Psychology and Vision Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact