Claudio Dappiaggi

47 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers

Claudio Dappiaggi
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 488
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 306
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 389
  • Mathematical Physics 173
  • Algebra and Number Theory 30
Replace Ivan G. Avramidi with:
Ivan G. Avramidi United States
Michael Dütsch Switzerland
Ricardo Schiappa Portugal
Kasia Rejzner United Kingdom
Erik Plauschinn Germany
Min-xin Huang China
Yu. M. Zinoviev Russia
Daniele Dorigoni United Kingdom
Rainer Verch Germany
S. L. Lyakhovich Russia
Claudio Dappiaggi relative to Ivan G. Avramidi United States Ivan G. Avramidi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Ivan G. Avramidi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Dappiaggi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Dappiaggi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Dappiaggi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Dappiaggi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Dappiaggi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Dappiaggi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Dappiaggi. The network helps show where Claudio Dappiaggi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Claudio Dappiaggi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claudio Dappiaggi Line = papers co-authored together Claudio Dappiaggi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201577
2 200363
3 200443
4 201633
5 201332
6 200931
7 201429
8 201826
9 201225
10 200825
11 201824
12 201821
13 201418
14 200417
15 201615
16 201715
17 201414
18 200814
19 201913
20 202211

About Claudio Dappiaggi

Claudio Dappiaggi is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (38 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (26 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (23 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (9 papers), Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (9 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers) and Advanced Operator Algebra Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (488 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (306 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (389 citations), Mathematical Physics (173 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (30 citations). Claudio Dappiaggi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Arcioni, Thomas-Paul Hack, Nicola Pinamonti, Klaus Fredenhagen, Marco Benini, Romeo Brunetti, Jakob Yngvason, Carlos Herdeiro, Valter Moretti and Alexander Schenkel. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Communications in Mathematical Physics, Physics Letters B, Annales Henri Poincaré and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact