Clarissa Smith

1.6k citations
52 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Clarissa Smith

43 papers receiving 898 citations

Peers

Clarissa Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Gender Studies 626
  • Clinical Psychology 548
  • Sociology and Political Science 460
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
  • Music 28
Replace Nathan A. Heflick with:
Nathan A. Heflick United States
Samuel Juni United States
Meagan M. Patterson United States
Kristina M. Zosuls United States
Sara N. Davis Brazil
Marc A. Sestir United States
Michelle Stratemeyer Australia
Cheryl K. Olson United States
Laura Scholes Australia
Nuran Hortaçsu Türkiye
Clarissa Smith relative to Nathan A. Heflick United States Nathan A. Heflick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Nathan A. Heflick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clarissa Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clarissa Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clarissa Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clarissa Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clarissa Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clarissa Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clarissa Smith. The network helps show where Clarissa Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clarissa Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clarissa Smith Line = papers co-authored together Clarissa Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975212
2 201886
3 200767
4 201454
5
One for the Girls!: The Pleasures and Practices of Reading Women's Porn
200748
6 201046
7 201443
8 201139
9 201037
10 202037
11 201133
12 201330
13 200729
14 201929
15 200228
16 200927
17 202124
18 201321
19 198019
20
Objectification on the difference between sex and sexism
202117

About Clarissa Smith

Clarissa Smith is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (30 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (24 papers), Sex work and related issues (8 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (6 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (5 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (626 citations), Clinical Psychology (548 citations), Sociology and Political Science (460 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (124 citations) and Music (28 citations). Clarissa Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Feona Attwood, Martin Barker, Alan McKee, Niall Richardson, Harry Levitt, Susanna Paasonen, Tarleton Gillespie, Rachel Scott, Danielle Blunt and Stefanie Duguay. Their work appears in journals such as Porn Studies, Sexualities, Sex Education, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Communication Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact