Clarence E. Smith

1.4k citations
8 papers · 1.1k · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Clarence E. Smith

8 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Clarence E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 475
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 322
  • Clinical Psychology 284
  • General Decision Sciences 28
  • Neurology 63
Replace Evan S. Shelby with:
Evan S. Shelby United States
W Schultz Switzerland
Dirk E. M. Geurts Netherlands
Doris E. Payer Canada
Sylvia M. L. Cox Canada
Buyean Lee United States
Paul J. Cocker Canada
Laurent Brichard United Kingdom
Jerald L. Varner United States
Benjamin D. Greenberg United States
Clarence E. Smith relative to Evan S. Shelby United States Evan S. Shelby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Evan S. Shelby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clarence E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clarence E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clarence E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clarence E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clarence E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clarence E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clarence E. Smith. The network helps show where Clarence E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Clarence E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clarence E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Clarence E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2010499
2 2010360
3 2008190
4 201247
5 201043
6
Basic Technology Competencies for Educators:A Self-Assessment Instrument
19973
7
Archeology of the Shasta Dam Area, California
19522
8
Archaeology of the Shasta Dam Area, California; Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey No. 18
19521

About Clarence E. Smith

Clarence E. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Space and Planetary Science, Paleontology, Anthropology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Digital literacy in education (1 paper) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (475 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (322 citations), Clinical Psychology (284 citations), General Decision Sciences (28 citations) and Neurology (63 citations). Clarence E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ronald L. Cowan, Ronald M. Baldwin, David Harold Zald, ROBERT M. KESSLER, Mohammad Sib Ansari, Evan S. Shelby, Neil D. Woodward, Joshua W. Buckholtz, Michael Tilghman Treadway and Ashley N. Schwartzman. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Science, Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Neuroscience and NeuroImage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact