Clare Sutherland

2.8k citations
43 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Clare Sutherland

41 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Clare Sutherland
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 988
  • Marketing 219
  • Clinical Psychology 227
  • Social Psychology 200
Replace S. Debbie with:
S. Debbie United States
Christopher D. Watkins United Kingdom
Mariëlle Stel Netherlands
Nicole L. Nelson Australia
Christine Hansen United States
Ryan M. Stolier United States
Otto H. MacLin United States
E. Richard Sorenson United States
Sheila J. Cunningham United Kingdom
Mary K. Hoard United States
Clare Sutherland relative to S. Debbie United States S. Debbie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
S. Debbie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clare Sutherland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clare Sutherland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clare Sutherland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clare Sutherland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clare Sutherland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clare Sutherland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clare Sutherland. The network helps show where Clare Sutherland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clare Sutherland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clare Sutherland Line = papers co-authored together Clare Sutherland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013288
2 2014149
3 2017131
4 201699
5 201485
6 201785
7 202057
8 201550
9 202349
10 201645
11 201742
12 202238
13 201937
14 201928
15 201227
16 202127
17 201925
18 201619
19 201918
20 201418

About Clare Sutherland

Clare Sutherland is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (35 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (27 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (17 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (988 citations), Marketing (219 citations), Clinical Psychology (227 citations) and Social Psychology (200 citations). Clare Sutherland has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew W. Young, Julian A. Oldmeadow, Gillian Rhodes, John Towler, D. M. Burt, Isabel M. Santos, Tom T. Hartley, Michael L. Slepian, Eric Hehman and Jessica Kay Flake. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Psychology, Cognition, Journal of Vision, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Royal Society Open Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact