C.J. Vineis

975 citations
29 papers · 774 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C.J. Vineis

29 papers receiving 722 citations

Peers

C.J. Vineis
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Instrumentation 154
  • Biophysics 64
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 551
  • Materials Chemistry 425
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 6
Replace Sheng‐Di Lin with:
Sheng‐Di Lin Taiwan
Dion McIntosh United States
Scott J. Maddox United States
C. W. Trussell United States
A. R. Clawson United States
Xiumei Shao China
Ömer Gökalp Memiş United States
Alan J. Kemp United Kingdom
Antti Härkönen Finland
Kazuo Fujiura Japan
C.J. Vineis relative to Sheng‐Di Lin Taiwan Sheng‐Di Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sheng‐Di Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.J. Vineis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. Vineis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. Vineis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. Vineis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. Vineis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. Vineis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. Vineis. The network helps show where C.J. Vineis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.J. Vineis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.J. Vineis Line = papers co-authored together C.J. Vineis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996184
2 200692
3 200987
4 200371
5 200869
6 200658
7 200443
8 200138
9 201237
10 200516
11 199815
12 200110
13 20047
14 20136
15 20016
16 20065
17 20095
18 20064
19 20124
20 20163

About C.J. Vineis

C.J. Vineis is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Instrumentation and Ophthalmology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 774 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (8 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (7 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (7 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (7 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (6 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (5 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (5 papers) and Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (154 citations), Biophysics (64 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (551 citations), Materials Chemistry (425 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (6 citations). C.J. Vineis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter K. Davies, Steven M. Bell, T. Negas, S.D. Calawa, Michael Walsh, C.A. Wang, David G. Cahill, Yee Kan Koh, Klavs F. Jensen and Eric A. Dauler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Crystal Growth, Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review B, Thin Solid Films and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact