C.J. van Rees
Impact in
-
- Wine Industry and Tourism
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Papers in
-
- Art History and Market Analysis 4
-
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development 4
- Co-authors
- Koen van Eijck (3 shared papers)Mia Stokmans (1 shared paper)Marc Verboord (1 shared paper)Gerard Seegers (1 shared paper)Matt Jones (1 shared paper)Simon Robinson (1 shared paper)Jennifer S. Pearson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Poetics (11 papers)International Data Privacy Law (1 paper)AI and Ethics (1 paper)Research portal (Tilburg University) (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
C.J. van Rees
16 papers receiving 209 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 15
- Urban Studies 54
- Music 26
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 37
- Literature and Literary Theory 45
Countries citing papers authored by C.J. van Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. van Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. van Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. van Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. van Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. van Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. van Rees. The network helps show where C.J. van Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside C.J. van Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 90 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 23 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 12 | The Internet and Dutch media repertoires | 2002 | 3 |
| 13 | Media repertoires of selective audiences | 2003 | 3 |
| 14 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 15 | De impact van literatuuropvattingen in het literaire veld. Aandachtsgebied literaire opvattingen van de Stichting Literatuurwetenschap | 2005 | 3 |
| 16 | An interdisciplinary view of cultural behavior | 1996 | 1 |
| 17 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2026 | 0 |
About C.J. van Rees
C.J. van Rees is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Urban Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (4 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (2 papers) and Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (15 citations), Urban Studies (54 citations), Music (26 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (37 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (45 citations). C.J. van Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Koen van Eijck, Mia Stokmans, Marc Verboord, Gerard Seegers, Matt Jones, Simon Robinson and Jennifer S. Pearson. Their work appears in journals such as Poetics, International Data Privacy Law, AI and Ethics and Research portal (Tilburg University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.