C.J. van Rees

419 citations
19 papers · 308 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

C.J. van Rees

17 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers

C.J. van Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Urban Studies 60
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 15
  • Music 28
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 40
  • Communication 38
Replace Kees van Rees with:
Kees van Rees Netherlands
Hannah Wohl United States
Gerald Raunig Switzerland
Robert Rosenblum United States
Paul Lopes United States
Barry Shank United States
J Benedict India
Reebee Garofalo United States
Dwight Macdonald
Ryan Moore United States
C.J. van Rees relative to Kees van Rees Netherlands Kees van Rees's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kees van Rees · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.J. van Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. van Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. van Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. van Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. van Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. van Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. van Rees. The network helps show where C.J. van Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside C.J. van Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.J. van Rees Line = papers co-authored together C.J. van Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 198792
2 198377
3 198926
4 198324
5 202216
6 198114
7 197711
8 19968
9 19847
10 19916
11 19875
12 20134
13 19914
14
Media repertoires of selective audiences
20034
15
An interdisciplinary view of cultural behavior
19963
16
The Internet and Dutch media repertoires
20023
17
De impact van literatuuropvattingen in het literaire veld. Aandachtsgebied literaire opvattingen van de Stichting Literatuurwetenschap
20053
18
Editorial : Conditions of cultural production and reception. Introduction special issue
19991
19 20260

About C.J. van Rees

C.J. van Rees is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Urban Studies, Philosophy and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 19 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (4 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers) and Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (60 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (15 citations), Music (28 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (40 citations) and Communication (38 citations). C.J. van Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Koen van Eijck, Marc Verboord, M.J.W. Stokmans, Gerard Seegers, Simon Robinson, Jennifer Pearson, S. Janssen and Wendy Griswold. Their work appears in journals such as Poetics, International Data Privacy Law, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), Research portal (Tilburg University) and AI and Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact