International Data Privacy Law

328 papers and 2.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 328 papers published in International Data Privacy Law in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in International Data Privacy Law usually cover Sociology and Political Science (215 papers), Law (165 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (146 papers) specifically the topics of Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (189 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (122 papers) and Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Data Privacy Law are Brent Mittelstadt, Sandra Wachter, Luciano Floridi, Ira Rubinstein, Andrew D. Selbst, Julia Powles, Gianclaudio Malgieri, Colin J. Bennett, Dan Jerker B. Svantesson and Bert‐Jaap Koops.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Data Privacy Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Data Privacy Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Data Privacy Law.

Countries where authors publish in International Data Privacy Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Data Privacy Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Data Privacy Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Data Privacy Law more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025