C.J. Hamilton

917 citations
43 papers · 647 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

C.J. Hamilton

38 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers

C.J. Hamilton
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 489
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 520
  • Neurology 35
  • Ophthalmology 34
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 39
Replace Matthew House with:
Matthew House Australia
Shi Hu China
Russell McLean Australia
A. Ruthven United Kingdom
Koji Kudo Japan
G. Brown United Kingdom
Moshe J. Willner United States
Mingjun Chi Denmark
Mingzhen Tian United States
L Stollenwerk Germany
C.J. Hamilton relative to Matthew House Australia Matthew House's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Matthew House · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.J. Hamilton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. Hamilton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. Hamilton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. Hamilton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. Hamilton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. Hamilton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. Hamilton. The network helps show where C.J. Hamilton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.J. Hamilton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.J. Hamilton Line = papers co-authored together C.J. Hamilton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199884
2 199868
3 201258
4 201154
5 200551
6 201135
7 199829
8 201325
9 199623
10 199821
11 199518
12 199718
13 199717
14 200216
15 199714
16 201213
17 201313
18 199710
19 20118
20 19966

About C.J. Hamilton

C.J. Hamilton is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Biophysics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (27 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (23 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (19 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (14 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (7 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (3 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (3 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (489 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (520 citations), Neurology (35 citations), Ophthalmology (34 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (39 citations). C.J. Hamilton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include J.H. Marsh, A.C. Bryce, Graeme P. A. Malcolm, Edik U. Rafailov, S.D. McDougall, Gareth T. Maker, R.M. De La Rue, J. Stewart Aitchison, B. Vögele and Łukasz Kornaszewski. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Optics Letters, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Electronics Letters and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact