Chuong Do
Impact in
- Accounting top 10%
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
-
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Papers in
- Accounting 13
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 13
- Corporate Finance and Governance 7
- Accounting Education and Careers 2
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies 2
- Finance 5
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 4
- Co-authors
- Kristian D. Allee (7 shared papers)Thomas C. Omer (4 shared papers)Andrew L. Maas (1 shared paper)Daphne Koller (1 shared paper)Andrew Y. Ng (1 shared paper)Sandeep Nabar (1 shared paper)Daniel M. Wells (1 shared paper)Bradley P. Lawson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Accounting Horizons (1 paper)Journal of Accounting and Economics (1 paper)Journal of International Accounting Research (1 paper)Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology (1 paper)European Accounting Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Chuong Do
14 papers receiving 135 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Accounting 84
- Finance 31
- Computer Science Applications 13
- Strategy and Management 28
- Health Informatics 2
Countries citing papers authored by Chuong Do
This map shows the geographic impact of Chuong Do's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chuong Do with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chuong Do more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chuong Do
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chuong Do. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chuong Do. The network helps show where Chuong Do may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Chuong Do, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 0 |
About Chuong Do
Chuong Do is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Information Systems, having authored 16 papers that have together received 144 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (2 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (1 paper) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (84 citations), Finance (31 citations), Computer Science Applications (13 citations), Strategy and Management (28 citations) and Health Informatics (2 citations). Chuong Do has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kristian D. Allee, Thomas C. Omer, Andrew L. Maas, Daphne Koller, Andrew Y. Ng, Sandeep Nabar, Daniel M. Wells and Bradley P. Lawson. Their work appears in journals such as Accounting Horizons, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of International Accounting Research, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology and European Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.