Chung‐Ping Lin

1.8k citations
67 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Chung‐Ping Lin

65 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Chung‐Ping Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 643
  • Insect Science 382
  • Genetics 533
  • Ecological Modeling 85
  • Horticulture 14
Replace Sara L. Goodacre with:
Sara L. Goodacre United Kingdom
Andrew Mitchell Australia
Michal Polák United States
Matthew A. Bertone United States
Shinji Sugiura Japan
Kazunori Yoshizawa Japan
Eric G. Chapman United States
Warren Booth United States
Thomas J. Simonsen Denmark
Patrick D. Lorch United States
Chung‐Ping Lin relative to Sara L. Goodacre United Kingdom Sara L. Goodacre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Sara L. Goodacre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chung‐Ping Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chung‐Ping Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chung‐Ping Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chung‐Ping Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chung‐Ping Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chung‐Ping Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chung‐Ping Lin. The network helps show where Chung‐Ping Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chung‐Ping Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chung‐Ping Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chung‐Ping Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003302
2 2015108
3 200554
4 200648
5 201843
6 201441
7 201041
8 201840
9 200439
10 201639
11 201934
12 200634
13 201033
14 201728
15 201027
16 201626
17 201725
18 201124
19 201823
20 201722

About Chung‐Ping Lin

Chung‐Ping Lin is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (27 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (12 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (12 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (11 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (11 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (643 citations), Insect Science (382 citations), Genetics (533 citations), Ecological Modeling (85 citations) and Horticulture (14 citations). Chung‐Ping Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bryan N. Danforth, Stanislav N. Gorb, Esther Appel, Jen‐Pan Huang, Lars Heepe, Wen‐San Huang, Hui‐Yun Tseng, Jennifer S. Fang, Wataru Kojima and Hamed Rajabi. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, PLoS ONE, Journal of Biogeography and Journal of Experimental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact