Chul-Sa Kim
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Papers in
-
- Insect Pest Control Strategies 12
- Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions 6
- Agricultural pest management studies 5
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 5
-
- Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids 8
- Co-authors
- Takehiro Kashiwagi (18 shared papers)Shin‐ichi Tebayashi (24 shared papers)Michio Horiike (18 shared papers)Hiroshi Fukami (6 shared papers)Ritsuo Nishida (4 shared papers)Tadakazu Nakashima (1 shared paper)Aman Dekebo (3 shared papers)Bin Wu (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Chul-Sa Kim
60 papers receiving 778 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Insect Science 215
- Biochemistry 61
- Plant Science 327
- Pharmacology 56
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 109
Countries citing papers authored by Chul-Sa Kim
This map shows the geographic impact of Chul-Sa Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chul-Sa Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chul-Sa Kim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chul-Sa Kim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chul-Sa Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chul-Sa Kim. The network helps show where Chul-Sa Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chul-Sa Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 16 |
About Chul-Sa Kim
Chul-Sa Kim is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Organic Chemistry and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (13 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (12 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (8 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (6 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (5 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (5 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (215 citations), Biochemistry (61 citations), Plant Science (327 citations), Pharmacology (56 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (109 citations). Chul-Sa Kim has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, China and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Takehiro Kashiwagi, Shin‐ichi Tebayashi, Michio Horiike, Hiroshi Fukami, Ritsuo Nishida, Tadakazu Nakashima, Aman Dekebo, Bin Wu, Mostofa Abu Hena and Syun‐ichi Kiyooka. Their work appears in journals such as Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, Tetrahedron Letters, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin and Phytochemistry Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.