Christopher R. Keyes

967 citations
59 papers · 688 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher R. Keyes

55 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers

Christopher R. Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 403
  • Global and Planetary Change 553
  • Ecology 226
  • Insect Science 92
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 41
Replace Míriam Piqué with:
Míriam Piqué Spain
Alex Finkral United States
Tara L. Keyser United States
C. Phillip Weatherspoon United States
Gary O. Fiddler United States
Antoni Trasobares Spain
P. Pérez‐Gorostiaga Spain
Ana Daría Ruiz-González Spain
Víctor M. Santana Spain
Steven B. Jack United States
Christopher R. Keyes relative to Míriam Piqué Spain Míriam Piqué's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Míriam Piqué · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher R. Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher R. Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher R. Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher R. Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher R. Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher R. Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher R. Keyes. The network helps show where Christopher R. Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher R. Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher R. Keyes Line = papers co-authored together Christopher R. Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200279
2 201143
3 201234
4 200134
5 202031
6 201530
7 201125
8 201224
9 201123
10 201521
11 200821
12 201221
13 200619
14 202019
15 200717
16 201815
17 201515
18 201714
19 201211
20 201911

About Christopher R. Keyes

Christopher R. Keyes is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Insect Science and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 59 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (35 papers), Forest ecology and management (28 papers), Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (10 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (9 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (8 papers) and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (403 citations), Global and Planetary Change (553 citations), Ecology (226 citations), Insect Science (92 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (41 citations). Christopher R. Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and France. Frequent co-authors include Kevin L. O’Hara, Sharon M. Hood, Douglas A. Maguire, Andrew J. Larson, John C. Tappeiner, Anna Sala, Justin S. Crotteau, Deborah S. Page‐Dumroese, Dean S. DeBell and Barbara L. Gartner. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Forest Science, Biomass and Bioenergy and International Journal of Wildland Fire.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact