Christopher Noto
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Motor Control and Adaptation
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 12
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 1
-
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 9
- Co-authors
- Farrel R. Robinson (7 shared papers)Albert F. Fuchs (5 shared papers)Shôji Watanabe (4 shared papers)Scott E. Bevans (1 shared paper)Robijanto Soetedjo (1 shared paper)Kaoru Yoshida (1 shared paper)Yoshiki Iwamoto (1 shared paper)Yoshiko Kojima (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Neurophysiology (5 papers)Experimental Brain Research (2 papers)Brain Research (2 papers)Vision Research (1 paper)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Christopher Noto
12 papers receiving 555 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Neurology 305
- Cognitive Neuroscience 470
- Sensory Systems 72
- Ophthalmology 68
- Human-Computer Interaction 36
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Noto
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Noto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Noto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Noto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Noto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Noto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Noto. The network helps show where Christopher Noto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Noto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 101 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 50 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 9 |
About Christopher Noto
Christopher Noto is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Sensory Systems, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (9 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (1 paper), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (1 paper) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (305 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (470 citations), Sensory Systems (72 citations), Ophthalmology (68 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (36 citations). Christopher Noto has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Farrel R. Robinson, Albert F. Fuchs, Shôji Watanabe, Scott E. Bevans, Robijanto Soetedjo, Kaoru Yoshida, Yoshiki Iwamoto, Yoshiko Kojima and James Gnadt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Experimental Brain Research, Brain Research, Vision Research and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.