Christopher Miles

544 citations
24 papers · 430 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Miles

24 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Christopher Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 38
  • Sensory Systems 56
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 221
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 17
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 89
Replace Lucy Wilkinson with:
Lucy Wilkinson United Kingdom
Heming Gao China
Dominic A. Valentino United States
A. Pierson France
Tuki Attuquayefio Australia
O. Alaoui-Ismaïli France
Tatjana Schreder Germany
Richard Conte Canada
Emi Yamano Japan
Veronika I. Müller Germany
Christopher Miles relative to Lucy Wilkinson United Kingdom Lucy Wilkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Lucy Wilkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Miles. The network helps show where Christopher Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Miles Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200741
2 199840
3 200235
4 200632
5 199630
6 200529
7 200629
8 200926
9 199625
10 199823
11 200523
12 199920
13 201117
14 200815
15 201214
16 200710
17 20126
18 20085
19 20133
20 20082

About Christopher Miles

Christopher Miles is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Signal Processing and Automotive Engineering, having authored 24 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (18 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Biometric Identification and Security (1 paper), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (1 paper), Workplace Health and Well-being (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (38 citations), Sensory Systems (56 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (221 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (17 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (89 citations). Christopher Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Johnson, Michelle Morgan, Alan B. Milne, Olivia Handley, Antony J. Bayer, Catriona M. Morrison, Justin C. D. Savage, John C. Miles, Martin J. Cox and Mark J. Buller. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Memory, British Journal of Psychology and Memory & Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact