Christopher Kong

502 citations
13 papers · 283 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 7
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 3
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 1
    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 3
    • Spinal Cord Injury Research 2

Christopher Kong

12 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Christopher Kong
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 114
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 35
  • Surgery 175
  • Gastroenterology 13
  • Emergency Medicine 6
Replace L. Löhrer with:
L. Löhrer Germany
Dirk H. Alander United States
Fetullah Cumhur Öner Netherlands
Solène Prost France
Masanari Takami Japan
Armando Alpízar-Aguirre Mexico
M.-A. Rousseau France
Grant D. Shifflett United States
Peter M. Formby United States
Lawrence A. Delasotta United States
Christopher Kong relative to L. Löhrer Germany L. Löhrer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
L. Löhrer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Kong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Kong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Kong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Kong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Kong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Kong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Kong. The network helps show where Christopher Kong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Kong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Kong Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Kong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201678
2 201541
3 201335
4 201734
5 201631
6 202218
7 201416
8 20189
9 20228
10 20226
11 20176
12 20161
13 20170

About Christopher Kong

Christopher Kong is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Physiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (2 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (114 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (35 citations), Surgery (175 citations), Gastroenterology (13 citations) and Emergency Medicine (6 citations). Christopher Kong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Hart, Neel Anand, Richard G. Fessler, Kevin Wing, Alastair Younger, D. Greg Anderson, Gregory D. Schroeder, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Christopher K. Kepler and Murray J. Penner. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Spine Deformity, The Bone & Joint Journal, The International Journal of Spine Surgery and Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact