Christopher Fairburn

3.5k citations
12 papers · 1.2k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Fairburn

12 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Christopher Fairburn
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Clinical Psychology 712
  • Applied Psychology 75
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 190
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
  • Pharmacy 42
Replace Wade H. Berrettini with:
Wade H. Berrettini United States
Christine Pollice United States
Jenni Leppänen United Kingdom
Melissa A. Munn‐Chernoff United States
Caroline Reid Canada
Kenneth R. Bruce Canada
Barbara Mangweth Austria
Lisa Lilenfeld United States
Elena Tenconi Italy
Cloninger Cr United States
Christopher Fairburn relative to Wade H. Berrettini United States Wade H. Berrettini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Wade H. Berrettini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Fairburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Fairburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Fairburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Fairburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Fairburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Fairburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Fairburn. The network helps show where Christopher Fairburn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Fairburn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Fairburn Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Fairburn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1981364
2 2003160
3 1998101
4 1997100
5 199188
6 200184
7 199778
8 200177
9 199959
10 200033
11 200013
12
La superación de los atracones de comida
19982

About Christopher Fairburn

Christopher Fairburn is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (1 paper), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (1 paper) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (712 citations), Applied Psychology (75 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (190 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations) and Pharmacy (42 citations). Christopher Fairburn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tony Hope, J. Keene, Robin Jacoby, Phillipa Hay, Jonathan Flint, David B. Allison, Guy M. Goodwin, Paul J. Harrison, Rupert McShane and Philip J. Cowen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine, The American Journal of Human Genetics and Twin Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact