Christopher Ellis

941 citations
17 papers · 599 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Ellis

16 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

Christopher Ellis
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Political Science and International Relations 468
  • Gender Studies 151
  • Communication 96
  • Public Administration 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 251
Replace Nick Vivyan with:
Nick Vivyan United Kingdom
André Freire Portugal
Tom Louwerse Netherlands
Henk van der Kolk Netherlands
Filip Kostelka United Kingdom
Andrew Rehfeld United States
Petra Guasti Czechia
Richard Herrera United States
Martin Bisgaard Denmark
Anthony J. McGann United States
Christopher Ellis relative to Nick Vivyan United Kingdom Nick Vivyan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Nick Vivyan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Ellis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Ellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Ellis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Ellis. The network helps show where Christopher Ellis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Ellis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Ellis Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Ellis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2012173
2 2008103
3 201257
4 200948
5 201146
6 201342
7 201140
8 201334
9 200620
10 201915
11 20115
12
The Other Side of the Coin: Public Opinion toward Social Tax Expenditures
20214
13 20084
14 20173
15 20103
16 20152
17 20250

About Christopher Ellis

Christopher Ellis is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management, having authored 17 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (13 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (7 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (468 citations), Gender Studies (151 citations), Communication (96 citations), Public Administration (20 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (251 citations). Christopher Ellis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James A. Stimson, Joseph Daniel Ura, Christopher Faricy, José M. F. Moura, R. D. Blanton and Yang Zou. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, Political Behavior, Political Research Quarterly, PS Political Science & Politics and Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact