Christopher Balme

1.9k citations
100 papers · 731 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Balme

61 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Christopher Balme
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 290
  • Music 112
  • Literature and Literary Theory 171
  • Cultural Studies 88
  • Museology 34
Replace Kobena Mercer with:
Kobena Mercer United States
Coco Fusco United States
Amelia Jones United States
Lynda Nead United Kingdom
Peter Wollen United States
Charles Baudelaire United States
bill brown United States
George H. Roeder United States
John Charles Chasteen United States
D. N. Rodowick United States
Christopher Balme relative to Kobena Mercer United States Kobena Mercer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Kobena Mercer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Balme

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Balme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Balme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Balme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Balme

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Balme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Balme. The network helps show where Christopher Balme may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Balme, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Balme Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Balme links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993253
2 201455
3 200855
4 199953
5 200033
6
Pacific Performances: Theatricality and Cross-Cultural Encounter in the South Seas
200630
7 200828
8 199827
9 201517
10 200717
11
Texte zur Theorie des Theaters
199115
12 199614
13 199711
14 19958
15 20017
16 20056
17 19945
18 20195
19 20195
20 20234

About Christopher Balme

Christopher Balme is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cultural Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Music, having authored 100 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (29 papers), Arts, Culture, and Music Studies (16 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (9 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (7 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Philippine History and Culture (4 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (3 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (290 citations), Music (112 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (171 citations), Cultural Studies (88 citations) and Museology (34 citations). Christopher Balme has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Janelle Reinelt, Joseph Roach, Bruce King, Tracy C. Davis, Jan-Dirk Müller, Erika Fischer‐Lichte, Michael Winkler and Gabriele Brandstetter. Their work appears in journals such as Theatre Research International, Theatre Survey, Theatre Journal, TDR/The Drama Review and Performance Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact