Christopher A. Devine

8 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Christopher A. Devine
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Neurology 74
  • Genetics 47
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 15
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 66
  • Surgery 124
Replace Sarah T. Menacho with:
Sarah T. Menacho United States
Daniël Hansen United States
Ian T. McNeill United States
Oksana Kirichek United Kingdom
Charles Bakhos United States
Kevin Cheng Australia
Costanza Chiapponi Germany
Joseph Hanna United States
Graham Stewart United Kingdom
Yuen Tsang United States
Christopher A. Devine relative to Sarah T. Menacho United States Sarah T. Menacho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sarah T. Menacho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher A. Devine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher A. Devine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher A. Devine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher A. Devine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher A. Devine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher A. Devine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher A. Devine. The network helps show where Christopher A. Devine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher A. Devine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher A. Devine Line = papers co-authored together Christopher A. Devine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2015135
2 201632
3 201627
4 201617
5 201915
6 201614
7 201812
8 20178

About Christopher A. Devine

Christopher A. Devine is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 8 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (1 paper), Meningioma and schwannoma management (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (1 paper), Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (74 citations), Genetics (47 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (15 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (66 citations) and Surgery (124 citations). Christopher A. Devine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include Kevin X. Liu, Ian F. Dunn, Hormuzdiyar H. Dasenbrock, Timothy R. Smith, William B. Gormley, Vamsidhar Chavakula, Elizabeth B. Claus, Aileen M. Davis, Laura M. Bogart and Jeffrey N. Katz. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Neurosurgical FOCUS and Journal of Autoimmunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact