Chris Eckl

739 citations
15 papers · 641 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Chris Eckl

14 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

Chris Eckl
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Artificial Intelligence 496
  • Health Information Management 31
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 58
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
  • Social Psychology 57
Replace Marco Polignano with:
Marco Polignano Italy
Shanu Sushmita United States
Xiaolei Huang United States
Pei-Yun Sabrina Hsueh United States
Koyel Chakraborty India
Mohammad Shoaib Jameel United Kingdom
Silvio Amir Portugal
Hui Yin Australia
Seng-Beng Ho Singapore
Sophia Yat Mei Lee Hong Kong
Chris Eckl relative to Marco Polignano Italy Marco Polignano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
Marco Polignano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Eckl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Eckl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Eckl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Eckl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Eckl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Eckl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Eckl. The network helps show where Chris Eckl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Chris Eckl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Eckl Line = papers co-authored together Chris Eckl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2010106
2 201092
3 200988
4 201285
5 201175
6 201061
7
AffectiveSpace: Blending Common Sense and Affective Knowledge to Perform Emotive Reasoning
200945
8
Towards Crowd Validation of the UK National Health Service
201037
9 201122
10 201212
11
Taking Refuge in Your Personal Sentic Corner
20118
12 20134
13 20124
14 20132
15 20240

About Chris Eckl

Chris Eckl is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (5 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (2 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (2 papers) and Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (496 citations), Health Information Management (31 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (58 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations) and Social Psychology (57 citations). Chris Eckl has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Amir Hussain, Erik Cambria, Catherine Havasi, James B. Munro, Tim Benson, T.S. Durrani, Warner V. Slack, Stephen James Leslie, Calum A. MacRae and Kaizhu Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Lecture notes in computer science, Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) and Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact