Chris Bevan

27 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Chris Bevan
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Human-Computer Interaction 132
  • Social Psychology 73
  • Literature and Literary Theory 32
  • Information Systems 58
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 44
Replace Md. Iftekhar Tanveer with:
Md. Iftekhar Tanveer United States
David Pizzi United Kingdom
Noah Schaffer
Valdemar Danry United States
Diogo Cabral Portugal
Axel Platz Germany
Christian Guckelsberger United Kingdom
Klaus-Peter Engelbrecht Germany
Petri Lankoski Finland
Loïc Caroux France
Chris Bevan relative to Md. Iftekhar Tanveer United States Md. Iftekhar Tanveer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Md. Iftekhar Tanveer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Bevan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Bevan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Bevan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Bevan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Bevan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Bevan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Bevan. The network helps show where Chris Bevan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Bevan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Bevan Line = papers co-authored together Chris Bevan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201547
2 201937
3 201630
4 201628
5 201423
6 200822
7 202017
8 201313
9 201812
10 201912
11 200811
12 20099
13 20097
14 20197
15 20236
16 20076
17 20205
18 20213
19 20183
20 20202

About Chris Bevan

Chris Bevan is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 27 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (12 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (3 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (3 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (132 citations), Social Psychology (73 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations), Information Systems (58 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (44 citations). Chris Bevan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Danaë Stanton Fraser, Kirsten Cater, Eamonn O’Neill, Sarah V. Stevenage, Harry Farmer, David Philip Green, Tim Kindberg, Richard Guest, Oscar Miguel‐Hurtado and David Green. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Pattern Recognition Letters, Virtual Reality and Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact