Abbe Don

781 citations
13 papers · 550 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
    • Interactive and Immersive Displays
    • Usability and User Interface Design
  • Biophysics top 10%
    • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Papers in

Abbe Don

12 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Abbe Don
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Human-Computer Interaction 205
  • Biophysics 43
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 136
  • Museology 22
  • Information Systems and Management 32
Replace Anshul Vikram Pandey with:
Anshul Vikram Pandey United States
Jarmo Laaksolahti Sweden
Robert S. Schulman United States
Ernest Adams United States
Anitawati Mohd Lokman Malaysia
Simone S. Borges Brazil
Yu-Ju Lin Taiwan
Satu Jumisko‐Pyykkö Finland
Ruotong Wang United States
Alfie Abdul‐Rahman United Kingdom
Abbe Don relative to Anshul Vikram Pandey United States Anshul Vikram Pandey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Anshul Vikram Pandey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Abbe Don

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Abbe Don's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abbe Don with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abbe Don more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Abbe Don

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abbe Don. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abbe Don. The network helps show where Abbe Don may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Abbe Don, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Abbe Don Line = papers co-authored together Abbe Don links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2002288
2 199389
3 200943
4 199237
5 199036
6 200219
7 199617
8 199110
9 19945
10 19913
11
3D imaging, analysis and modelling of bouillon cubes using x-ray microtomography
20081
12 19911
13 19951

About Abbe Don

Abbe Don is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology and Information Systems, having authored 13 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (1 paper), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (1 paper), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (1 paper), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (1 paper) and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (205 citations), Biophysics (43 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (136 citations), Museology (22 citations) and Information Systems and Management (32 citations). Abbe Don has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Allan Kuchinsky, Celine Pering, Dávid Fröhlich, Steven Ariss, H. van Aalst, J. C. G. Blonk, Brenda Laurel, John J. Birmingham, Ben Shneiderman and T. van Vliet. Their work appears in journals such as Food Research International, Journal of Microscopy, Leonardo, LWT and Inżynieria Materiałowa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact