Chong‐O. Lee

1.4k citations
38 papers · 1.1k · h-index 23

Impact in

  • Biotechnology top 0.5%
    • Marine Sponges and Natural Products
    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
    • Fungal Biology and Applications

Papers in

Chong‐O. Lee

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Chong‐O. Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Biotechnology 602
  • Pharmacology 495
  • Toxicology 73
  • Organic Chemistry 489
  • Cancer Research 207
Replace E. Dilip de Silva with:
E. Dilip de Silva Sri Lanka
Rogelio Fernández Spain
Kwang Sik Im South Korea
Javier Salvá Spain
Taro Amagata United States
Hao‐Bing Yu China
Chung Ja Sim South Korea
Malcolm S. Buchanan Australia
Sylvain Petek France
Alla G. Guzii Russia
Chong‐O. Lee relative to E. Dilip de Silva Sri Lanka E. Dilip de Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
E. Dilip de Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chong‐O. Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chong‐O. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chong‐O. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chong‐O. Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chong‐O. Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chong‐O. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chong‐O. Lee. The network helps show where Chong‐O. Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chong‐O. Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chong‐O. Lee Line = papers co-authored together Chong‐O. Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005171
2 200583
3 200679
4 200662
5 200356
6 200750
7 200342
8 200241
9 200137
10 201036
11 200334
12 200034
13 201133
14 200932
15 199832
16 200631
17 200730
18 200429
19 200427
20 200526

About Chong‐O. Lee

Chong‐O. Lee is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (35 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (22 papers), Synthesis and Biological Activity (12 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (11 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (4 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers) and Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (602 citations), Pharmacology (495 citations), Toxicology (73 citations), Organic Chemistry (489 citations) and Cancer Research (207 citations). Chong‐O. Lee has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, China and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Jee H. Jung, Jongki Hong, Kwang Sik Im, Chung Ja Sim, Baoquan Bao, Tayyab A. Mansoor, Xin‐Sheng Yao, Qishi Sun, Dong‐Kyoo Kim and Yonghong Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Archives of Pharmacal Research, Tetrahedron and Marine Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact