Chok‐Fun Chui
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Transgenic Plants and Applications
Papers in
-
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 4
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 2
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 1
- Protist diversity and phylogeny 1
-
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications 2
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research 1
- Co-authors
- Barbara J. Mazur (5 shared papers)Julie K. Smith (2 shared papers)Pamela Dunsmuir (1 shared paper)James M. Tepperman (1 shared paper)Jeffrey Townsend (1 shared paper)John Bedbrook (1 shared paper)Margaret E. Black (1 shared paper)S. Carl Falco (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Crop Science (1 paper)Food and Chemical Toxicology (1 paper)The EMBO Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Chok‐Fun Chui
8 papers receiving 590 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Plant Science 475
- Biotechnology 85
- Molecular Biology 465
- Pollution 64
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 46
Countries citing papers authored by Chok‐Fun Chui
This map shows the geographic impact of Chok‐Fun Chui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chok‐Fun Chui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chok‐Fun Chui more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chok‐Fun Chui
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chok‐Fun Chui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chok‐Fun Chui. The network helps show where Chok‐Fun Chui may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chok‐Fun Chui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 236 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 203 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 59 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 3 |
About Chok‐Fun Chui
Chok‐Fun Chui is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pollution, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 649 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (2 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (1 paper), Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins (1 paper), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (1 paper), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (1 paper) and Protist diversity and phylogeny (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (475 citations), Biotechnology (85 citations), Molecular Biology (465 citations), Pollution (64 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (46 citations). Chok‐Fun Chui has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Mazur, Julie K. Smith, Pamela Dunsmuir, James M. Tepperman, Jeffrey Townsend, John Bedbrook, Margaret E. Black, S. Carl Falco, Linda A. Malley and Raymond J. Layton. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Crop Science, Food and Chemical Toxicology and The EMBO Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.