Chloé E. Hill

54 papers receiving 740 citations

Peers

Chloé E. Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 294
  • Health Informatics 17
  • Neurology 77
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 84
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 15
Replace Rebecca J. Swain‐Eng with:
Rebecca J. Swain‐Eng United States
M E Beth Smith United States
Viji Pulikkel Chandran India
Justin Romanoff United States
Tim Wilkinson United Kingdom
Patrizia Berto Italy
Katie Wilde United Kingdom
Amir H. Zamanipoor Najafabadi Netherlands
Arron Lacey United Kingdom
Darin Correll United States
Chloé E. Hill relative to Rebecca J. Swain‐Eng United States Rebecca J. Swain‐Eng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×24.5×
Rebecca J. Swain‐Eng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chloé E. Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloé E. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloé E. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloé E. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloé E. Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloé E. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloé E. Hill. The network helps show where Chloé E. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloé E. Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chloé E. Hill Line = papers co-authored together Chloé E. Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018103
2 201771
3 202160
4 202059
5 200741
6 202129
7 202125
8 202025
9 201523
10 202121
11 202020
12 201720
13 202220
14 202319
15 201918
16 202015
17 202315
18 202213
19 202013
20 201812

About Chloé E. Hill

Chloé E. Hill is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 58 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (23 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (7 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Marine animal studies overview (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper) and Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (294 citations), Health Informatics (17 citations), Neurology (77 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (84 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (15 citations). Chloé E. Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Brian Litt, James Burke, Samuel W. Terman, Kathryn A. Davis, Brian C. Callaghan, Chun Chieh Lin, Lesli E. Skolarus, Nabila Dahodwala, Colin A. Ellis and Gregory J. Esper. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Epilepsy & Behavior, Epilepsia, Epilepsia Open and Seizure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact