Chi-Sing Ho
Impact in
- Biophysics top 0.5%
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Analytical Chemistry top 2%
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Papers in
-
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research 6
-
- Biosensors and Analytical Detection 4
- Co-authors
- Jennifer A. Dionne (6 shared papers)Amr A. E. Saleh (4 shared papers)Stefanie S. Jeffrey (3 shared papers)Niaz Banaei (3 shared papers)Stefano Ermon (2 shared papers)Mark Holodniy (1 shared paper)Catherine A. Hogan (1 shared paper)Lena Blackmon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nature Communications (1 paper)Neuro-Oncology Advances (1 paper)The Journal of Chemical Physics (1 paper)ACS Photonics (1 paper)Nano Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEgyptNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Chi-Sing Ho
12 papers receiving 980 citations
Chi-Sing Ho's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Biophysics 477
- Analytical Chemistry 240
- Clinical Biochemistry 134
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 221
- Biomedical Engineering 443
Countries citing papers authored by Chi-Sing Ho
This map shows the geographic impact of Chi-Sing Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi-Sing Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi-Sing Ho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chi-Sing Ho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi-Sing Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi-Sing Ho. The network helps show where Chi-Sing Ho may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chi-Sing Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rapid identification of pathogenic bacteria using Raman spectroscopy and deep learning Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 641 |
| 2 | 2016 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 59 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 1 |
About Chi-Sing Ho
Chi-Sing Ho is a scholar working on Biophysics, Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Molecular Biology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (6 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (4 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (2 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (1 paper) and Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (477 citations), Analytical Chemistry (240 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (134 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (221 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (443 citations). Chi-Sing Ho has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer A. Dionne, Amr A. E. Saleh, Stefanie S. Jeffrey, Niaz Banaei, Stefano Ermon, Mark Holodniy, Catherine A. Hogan, Lena Blackmon, Neal Jean and Yang Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Neuro-Oncology Advances, The Journal of Chemical Physics, ACS Photonics and Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.