Ching‐Wei Yang

699 citations
25 papers · 518 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Wei Yang

22 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Ching‐Wei Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Finance 129
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 95
  • Economics and Econometrics 135
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
  • Molecular Medicine 18
Replace Jiaojiao Fan with:
Jiaojiao Fan China
Wenxi Jiang China
Jianming Ye China
Jaeyoung Kim South Korea
Ching‐Chung Lin Taiwan
Huiping Zhang China
Siqin Liu China
Qi Zheng United States
Qian Zou China
Xiaolan Xu China
Ching‐Wei Yang relative to Jiaojiao Fan China Jiaojiao Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Jiaojiao Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Wei Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Wei Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Wei Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Wei Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Wei Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Wei Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Wei Yang. The network helps show where Ching‐Wei Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Wei Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Wei Yang Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Wei Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000159
2 201396
3 201934
4 201428
5 201625
6 202122
7 202122
8 202019
9 202117
10 201214
11 202413
12 201813
13 202010
14 20229
15 20239
16 20249
17 20227
18 20186
19 20222
20 20242

About Ching‐Wei Yang

Ching‐Wei Yang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nephrology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 25 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (2 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (2 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (2 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (2 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (2 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (1 paper) and Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (129 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (95 citations), Economics and Econometrics (135 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations) and Molecular Medicine (18 citations). Ching‐Wei Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bwo‐Nung Huang, John Wei-Shan Hu, Hsiao‐Jen Chung, Yen‐Hwa Chang, Pin Su, Shu-Huei Shen, Jia-Hwia Wang, Kuang‐Kuo Chen, Hsing‐Yu Chen and Yu‐Chun Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Frontiers in Pharmacology, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Scientific Reports and Advanced Optical Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact