Ching‐Wei Lin

1.2k citations
50 papers · 976 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Wei Lin

48 papers receiving 964 citations

Peers

Ching‐Wei Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Electrochemistry 68
  • Materials Chemistry 496
  • Biomedical Engineering 355
  • Biomaterials 75
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 94
Replace Luigi Tarpani with:
Luigi Tarpani Italy
Richard D. Yang United States
F. De Matteis Italy
Xiaojun Hu China
Shafigh Mehraeen United States
Prabhakaran Munusamy United States
Ajit K. Mahapatro India
Kenith E. Meissner United States
Hyun Kyong Shon South Korea
Yaowu Hao United States
Ching‐Wei Lin relative to Luigi Tarpani Italy Luigi Tarpani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Luigi Tarpani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Wei Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Wei Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Wei Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Wei Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Wei Lin. The network helps show where Ching‐Wei Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Wei Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Wei Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Wei Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011146
2 201486
3 201978
4 201976
5 201659
6 202049
7 202147
8 202243
9 201934
10 200932
11 200230
12 202128
13 201721
14 201619
15 202019
16 201816
17 202214
18 202313
19 201813
20 201513

About Ching‐Wei Lin

Ching‐Wei Lin is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Molecular Biology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 976 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (7 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (7 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (6 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (6 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (6 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (6 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (68 citations), Materials Chemistry (496 citations), Biomedical Engineering (355 citations), Biomaterials (75 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (94 citations). Ching‐Wei Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include R. Bruce Weisman, Sergei M. Bachilo, Angela M. Belcher, Wei‐Hsiu Hung, Jeng-Tzong Sheu, Jason K. Streit, Saunab Ghosh, Jifa Qi, Neelkanth M. Bardhan and Zueng‐Sang Chen. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Nano, Biochemistry, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Nano Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact