Ching‐Wei Lin

1.2k citations
46 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Wei Lin

45 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Ching‐Wei Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Materials Chemistry 517
  • Electrochemistry 68
  • Biomedical Engineering 370
  • Biomaterials 77
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 98
Replace Luigi Tarpani with:
Luigi Tarpani Italy
Richard D. Yang United States
Shafigh Mehraeen United States
Xiaoshan Zhu United States
Ajit K. Mahapatro India
Pierre Brodard Switzerland
Hyun Kyong Shon South Korea
Liwei Xiong China
Guillaume Wang France
Ruhai Tian United States
Ching‐Wei Lin relative to Luigi Tarpani Italy Luigi Tarpani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Luigi Tarpani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Wei Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Wei Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Wei Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Wei Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Wei Lin. The network helps show where Ching‐Wei Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Wei Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Wei Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Wei Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011150
2 201492
3 201983
4 201981
5 201661
6 202153
7 202053
8 202245
9 201935
10 200932
11 200230
12 202128
13 201723
14 201621
15 202020
16 201817
17 202216
18 202315
19 200415
20 201814

About Ching‐Wei Lin

Ching‐Wei Lin is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biomaterials, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (7 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (7 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (6 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (6 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (5 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (517 citations), Electrochemistry (68 citations), Biomedical Engineering (370 citations), Biomaterials (77 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (98 citations). Ching‐Wei Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Norway. Frequent co-authors include R. Bruce Weisman, Sergei M. Bachilo, Angela M. Belcher, Wei‐Hsiu Hung, Jeng-Tzong Sheu, Jason K. Streit, Saunab Ghosh, Jifa Qi, Neelkanth M. Bardhan and Zeng‐Yei Hseu. Their work appears in journals such as Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, ACS Nano, Nano Letters, Journal of The Electrochemical Society and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact