Ching‐Ping Liang

52 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ching‐Ping Liang
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 248
  • Environmental Engineering 562
  • Water Science and Technology 442
  • Environmental Chemistry 287
  • Pollution 270
Replace Sheng‐Wei Wang with:
Sheng‐Wei Wang Taiwan
Mark N. Goltz United States
M. Sardin France
Kirk Hatfield United States
Arash Massoudieh United States
Jui-Sheng Chen Taiwan
Mark A. Widdowson United States
Charles B. Andrews China
Estanislao Pujades Spain
Joanne Vanderzalm Australia
Ching‐Ping Liang relative to Sheng‐Wei Wang Taiwan Sheng‐Wei Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Sheng‐Wei Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Ping Liang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Ping Liang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Ping Liang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Ping Liang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Ping Liang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Ping Liang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Ping Liang. The network helps show where Ching‐Ping Liang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Ping Liang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Ping Liang Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Ping Liang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009204
2 201877
3 200572
4 200761
5 201858
6 201656
7 201051
8 200851
9 200545
10 201040
11 200840
12 201736
13 201536
14 201936
15 201236
16 201232
17 200929
18 201627
19 201526
20 202225

About Ching‐Ping Liang

Ching‐Ping Liang is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Water Science and Technology and Geochemistry and Petrology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Groundwater flow and contamination studies (25 papers), Arsenic contamination and mitigation (13 papers), Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (11 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (8 papers), Heavy metals in environment (8 papers), Groundwater and Watershed Analysis (7 papers), Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (7 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (248 citations), Environmental Engineering (562 citations), Water Science and Technology (442 citations), Environmental Chemistry (287 citations) and Pollution (270 citations). Ching‐Ping Liang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jui-Sheng Chen, Chen‐Wuing Liu, Cheng‐Shin Jang, Sheng‐Wei Wang, Chi‐Chih Chen, Chenju Liang, Yi‐Chi Chien, Jui‐Sheng Chen, Yu‐Mei Hsueh and Shih‐Kai Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hydrology, Advances in Water Resources, The Science of The Total Environment, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Hydrological Processes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact