Chingmuh Lee

1.3k citations
55 papers · 818 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Chingmuh Lee

55 papers receiving 768 citations

Peers

Chingmuh Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 447
  • Developmental Neuroscience 128
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 93
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 139
  • Surgery 235
Replace B. E. Waud with:
B. E. Waud United States
H. H. Ali United States
Deryck Duncalf United States
Richard R. Johnston United States
Edward A. Brunner United States
Yusuke Ito Japan
Junichi Ogata Japan
S. D. Gergis United States
N. N. Durant United States
Juliet M. Serrao United Kingdom
Chingmuh Lee relative to B. E. Waud United States B. E. Waud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
B. E. Waud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chingmuh Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chingmuh Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chingmuh Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chingmuh Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chingmuh Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chingmuh Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chingmuh Lee. The network helps show where Chingmuh Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chingmuh Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chingmuh Lee Line = papers co-authored together Chingmuh Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009148
2 197581
3 198246
4 197537
5 200330
6 199923
7 197723
8 199922
9 200921
10 197721
11 199918
12 197718
13 197517
14 199917
15 197517
16 200216
17 197716
18 197716
19 200114
20 197614

About Chingmuh Lee

Chingmuh Lee is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (26 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (10 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (8 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (7 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (447 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (128 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (93 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (139 citations) and Surgery (235 citations). Chingmuh Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Ronald L. Katz, Laszlo Gyermek, Mark H. Zornow, Mohamed Naguib, Keith Candiotti, Brian Warriner, Jonathan S. Jahr, Sachiko Kawasaki‐Yatsugi, Tokio Yamaguchi and Tomoki Nishiyama. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, British Journal of Anaesthesia and American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact