Ching‐Min Chen

61 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Ching‐Min Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Leadership and Management 41
  • Research and Theory 68
  • Emergency Medical Services 121
  • General Health Professions 213
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 26
Replace Carol P. Vojir with:
Carol P. Vojir United States
Myonghwa Park South Korea
Ching‐Huey Chen Taiwan
Alireza Irajpour Iran
Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt Denmark
Hamid Peyrovi Iran
Sachiyo Murashima Japan
Annelise Norlyk Denmark
Tinne Dilles Belgium
Michelle Butler Ireland
Ching‐Min Chen relative to Carol P. Vojir United States Carol P. Vojir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.9×
Carol P. Vojir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Min Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Min Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Min Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Min Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Min Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Min Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Min Chen. The network helps show where Ching‐Min Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Min Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Min Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Min Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200793
2 200853
3 202051
4 201650
5 201645
6 200644
7 201644
8 201837
9 201136
10 201735
11 201334
12 202033
13 201531
14 201731
15 201530
16 201730
17 201628
18 200725
19 201125
20 201723

About Ching‐Min Chen

Ching‐Min Chen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Research and Theory, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers), Aging, Health, and Disability (5 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (4 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Health Education and Validation (3 papers) and Nursing care and research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Leadership and Management (41 citations), Research and Theory (68 citations), Emergency Medical Services (121 citations), General Health Professions (213 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (26 citations). Ching‐Min Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Indonesia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ferry Efendi, Hsiao‐Mei Chen, Pei‐Lun Hsieh, Anna Kurniati, Sarni Maniar Berliana, Kuei‐Ru Chou, Pei‐Shan Tsai, Yi-Hsuan Tu, Nursalam Nursalam and Mei‐Yeh Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Research, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Health Care For Women International, Advances in Nursing Science and International Nursing Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact