Ching‐Min Chen

67 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Ching‐Min Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 31
  • Emergency Medical Services 79
  • Research and Theory 10
  • General Health Professions 207
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
Replace Elizabeth Swanson with:
Elizabeth Swanson United States
Mark Quirk United States
Howard K. Butcher United States
Jie Hu United States
Masoud Bahrami Iran
Sonya R. Hardin United States
Barbara K Haas United States
Lynne Robins United States
Charles H. Griffith United States
Ching‐Min Chen relative to Elizabeth Swanson United States Elizabeth Swanson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Elizabeth Swanson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Min Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Min Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Min Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Min Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Min Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Min Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Min Chen. The network helps show where Ching‐Min Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Min Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Min Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Min Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200790
2 200853
3 201648
4 202047
5 201645
6 200643
7 201640
8 201134
9 201333
10 201133
11 201833
12 201530
13 202030
14 201730
15 201729
16 201627
17 201727
18 201526
19 201125
20 200724

About Ching‐Min Chen

Ching‐Min Chen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (3 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (31 citations), Emergency Medical Services (79 citations), Research and Theory (10 citations), General Health Professions (207 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations). Ching‐Min Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Indonesia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ferry Efendi, Hsiao‐Mei Chen, Pei‐Lun Hsieh, Anna Kurniati, Sarni Maniar Berliana, Kuei‐Ru Chou, Pei‐Shan Tsai, Yi-Hsuan Tu, Nursalam Nursalam and Mei‐Yeh Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Research, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Health Care For Women International, International Nursing Review and Journal of Nursing Scholarship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact