Ching‐Lin Ho

962 citations
13 papers · 256 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Lin Ho

12 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Ching‐Lin Ho
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Ophthalmology 161
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 69
  • Environmental Engineering 33
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 24
  • Management Science and Operations Research 15
Replace Frank Bochmann with:
Frank Bochmann Switzerland
Ai Kido Japan
Shuai-Chun Lin United States
Dawn Lim Singapore
Kyle MacLean United States
Wajid Ali Khan Pakistan
Mônica Santos Salgado Brazil
Jaakko Sahlsten Finland
AW Musk Australia
Fred Nugen United States
Ching‐Lin Ho relative to Frank Bochmann Switzerland Frank Bochmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
Frank Bochmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Lin Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Lin Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Lin Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Lin Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Lin Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Lin Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Lin Ho. The network helps show where Ching‐Lin Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Lin Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Lin Ho Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Lin Ho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201452
2 201044
3 200636
4 200635
5 201523
6 201118
7 200913
8 201613
9 201110
10 20078
11 20103
12
Efficacy and Safety of a Systematic Switch From Latanoprost to Travoprost in Patients With Glaucoma
20071
13 20250

About Ching‐Lin Ho

Ching‐Lin Ho is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Organic Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (1 paper), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (1 paper), Retinal and Macular Surgery (1 paper), Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction (1 paper), Corneal surgery and disorders (1 paper) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (161 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (69 citations), Environmental Engineering (33 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (24 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (15 citations). Ching‐Lin Ho has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Tin Aung, Donald Tan, Mani Baskaran, Shamira Perera, Sek‐Tien Hoh, Tina Wong, Laurence Shen Lim, Leonard P. K. Ang, Francis T.S. Oen and Arun Narayanaswamy. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Glaucoma, JAMA Ophthalmology and Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact