Fred Nugen

4.8k citations
10 papers · 188 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Nugen

10 papers receiving 186 citations

Peers

Fred Nugen
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Health Informatics 71
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 76
  • Family Practice 4
  • Neurology 9
  • Health Information Management 5
Replace Krishna Nand Keshava Murthy with:
Krishna Nand Keshava Murthy United States
Andra-Iza Iuga Germany
Feyisope Eweje United States
John Ryu United States
Patcharapon Jantana Thailand
Ali S. Tejani United States
Jinchi Wei United States
Ural Koç Türkiye
Prasanth Prasanna United States
Nina Kottler United States
Fred Nugen relative to Krishna Nand Keshava Murthy United States Krishna Nand Keshava Murthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Krishna Nand Keshava Murthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Nugen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Nugen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Nugen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Nugen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Nugen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Nugen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Nugen. The network helps show where Fred Nugen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Nugen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Nugen Line = papers co-authored together Fred Nugen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 202266
2 202261
3 202318
4 202315
5 20238
6 20236
7 20245
8 20235
9 20233
10 20241

About Fred Nugen

Fred Nugen is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Ophthalmology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 188 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (1 paper), Anatomy and Medical Technology (1 paper) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (71 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (76 citations), Family Practice (4 citations), Neurology (9 citations) and Health Information Management (5 citations). Fred Nugen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Bradley J. Erickson, Bardia Khosravi, Mana Moassefi, Yashbir Singh, Pouria Rouzrokh, Shahriar Faghani, Jaidip Jagtap, Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, Diana V. Vera-Garcia and Shiba Kuanar. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Arthroplasty, Radiology Artificial Intelligence, Experimental Eye Research, Pancreatology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact