Chien‐Ching Li
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 10%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
-
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 2
-
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation 5
- Co-authors
- Alicia K. Matthews (23 shared papers)Frances Aranda (3 shared papers)Lisa M. Kuhns (3 shared papers)XinQi Dong (5 shared papers)Raj C. Shah (3 shared papers)Emily Hallgren (1 shared paper)Andrea C. King (2 shared papers)Anna Hotton (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- LGBT Health (3 papers)Journal of the National Medical Association (3 papers)Innovation in Aging (2 papers)Journal of Advanced Nursing (1 paper)Nicotine & Tobacco Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwanNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Chien‐Ching Li
28 papers receiving 439 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Social Psychology 138
- Health 32
- Applied Psychology 15
- Physiology 72
- General Health Professions 64
Countries citing papers authored by Chien‐Ching Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Chien‐Ching Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chien‐Ching Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chien‐Ching Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chien‐Ching Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chien‐Ching Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chien‐Ching Li. The network helps show where Chien‐Ching Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chien‐Ching Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5 |
About Chien‐Ching Li
Chien‐Ching Li is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (138 citations), Health (32 citations), Applied Psychology (15 citations), Physiology (72 citations) and General Health Professions (64 citations). Chien‐Ching Li has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alicia K. Matthews, Frances Aranda, Lisa M. Kuhns, XinQi Dong, Raj C. Shah, Emily Hallgren, Andrea C. King, Anna Hotton, Alana Steffen and Larisa Burke. Their work appears in journals such as LGBT Health, Journal of the National Medical Association, Innovation in Aging, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.